Showing posts with label experience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label experience. Show all posts

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Disproportional curves

jumping though hoops indeed!
Some random thoughts on the frustrations of the job search process:
1. The less skilled the job, the longer the application. I recently filled out a 25 page application and a 100 item questionnaire for a retail job. I guess they want to be sure you're not going to steal some trinket, or that you're savvy enough to give the required answer to the questions.
Silly.
But we do it anyway.
The corollary of this is the paradox of a credit check as a condition of employment. If you're potentially working with sensitive material or with funds, this makes a measure of sense. But when people are out of work, their credit invariably takes a hit, since their revenue stream becomes inconsistent. So if your credit rating goes down because  you're out of work, and it adversely effects your potential to be hired, you can't get a job because you need one. Several states have done away with this unreasonable practice, and others are working on it.
2. Does it strike anyone else as odd that there's a disproportionate curve to having work? If you have work, it's usually easier to get more. As my friend Connie Moore noted, people don't necessarily want to hire you because you're the best for the job. Many people want to hire you to prevent someone else from hiring you. It's a strange kind of one-up-manship. It's not necessarily that they want your skills so much as they want someone else to not have your skills. If you doubt that, next time you're employed, tell your supervisor that you've had another offer. Odds are they'll match it.
Your skills haven't changed. Your value to the organization hasn't changed. The only difference in your skills is that someone else wants them.
3. Conversely, once you are not working, it's much harder to start again. Depending on your skill set and the marketplace, it's almost always easier to change jobs than it is to get a new one when you don't have one.
4. The phrase "not working" has pejorative connotations. It can be read as not functioning, or broken. When someone doesn't have a job, presuming the individual remains sufficiently motivated to keep their hand in in their chosen profession, their skills are just as valid. Let's lose the stigma associated with joblessness, shall we?
Proper terminology can be our friend. I recall the old Emo Phillips joke: "I lost my job. Well, I didn't actually lose it. I know where it is. But I go there and there's this other guy doing it!"
5 By the same token, it's crucial to respect potential employers, not just because they might be able to grant you a means to a livelihood, but because they're also human beings, and they have their own set of problems and crises that transcend the send CV - interview - thank you note - month later follow up that is now de rigeur in the job search dance.

Monday, January 31, 2011

"So tell me about yourself...."

What a boring question that is.
The answer's not boring, but the oft-repeated question is.
Well, okay.
Here's every job I've ever had, in chronological order, starting at age 11!
Gas station attendant
Bakery order packer
KFC cook
Road crew worker
Trucking crew assisant
Burger King cook
KFC cook again
Accounting assistant, Public School bus garage
Retail clerk, Sears Automotive
Foundry worker (shakeout, grinder)
Plaster caster
Dishwasher
Bartender
short order cook
prep cook
Theatre usher, janitor, box office and concession worker
Theatre manager
Receptionist
Factory line worker
Medical kit assembly
Retail commission sales
Assistant manager, video store
Personal care attendant
Papermaking assistant
Art exhibition setup
Teaching assistant, summer program
Adjunct faculty, technical college
Adjunct faculty, art college
Crew leader assistant, US Census
Adjunct faculty, art college
So what's the point?
Very few of us have direct paths, yet the job hunting process is geared towards only recognizing specific, directed skills.
"have you done this all your life?"
"Not yet..."
This is in part due to marketplace strictures. After all, if you have a choice between someone with 45 years of direct experience and someone with 45 years of transferable skills, it's likely that you'll hire the former.
But you could be doing yourself a disservice.
Someone with a wide range of experience knows how to adapt to different environments. That person also has skills and confidence in a wide range of areas. You're missing a bet by not hiring that person!
Of course, this is a call for an employer to hire me, but it's also a general call for a new vision on the part of employers.
Not giving someone a chance to use any of their skills wastes all those skills.

Photo from the Library of Congress Archive!